Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A370M and 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A370M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 115W)
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1695MHz vs 1550MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A370M
3.174 TFLOPS
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation +392%
15.62 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Mar 2023
Alchemist
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
1395 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
36
1024
Shading Units
4608
64
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
144
8
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

49.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
81.36 GPixel/s
99.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
244.1 GTexel/s
6.349 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
15.62 TFLOPS
3.174 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.62 TFLOPS
793.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
244.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
115W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
AD106
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
22.9 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
188 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy