Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A380 vs ATI FirePro V3800

Intel Arc A380 vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
624 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A380 +707%
4.198 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2022
Release Date
Apr 2010
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
400
64
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
43W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Redwood
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy