Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A380 vs AMD FireStream 9250

Intel Arc A380 vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A380 +319%
4.198 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2022
Release Date
Jun 2008
Alchemist
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
1024
Shading Units
800
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
RV770
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy