Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A750 vs AMD FirePro W9000

Intel Arc A750 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A750 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A750 +330%
17.2 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2050 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
2048
224
TMUs
128
112
ROPs
32
448
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

268.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
34.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
274W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
Tahiti
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy