Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A750 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

Intel Arc A750 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A750 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 158% (2400MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A750 +1706%
17.2 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Dec 2013
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2050 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
512
224
TMUs
32
112
ROPs
16
448
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

268.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
34.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
65W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
Cape Verde
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy