Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (2400MHz vs 1650MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (185W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A770
+158%
19.66 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX
7.603 TFLOPS
Blender
Arc A770
+95%
2292
CMP 40HX
1174
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Feb 2021
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
2100 MHz
Base Clock
1470 MHz
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
36
4096
Shading Units
2304
256
TMUs
144
128
ROPs
64
512
Tensor Cores
288
32
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
307.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
614.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
39.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
19.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
185W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
TU106
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
