Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A770 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

Intel Arc A770 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (2400MHz vs 1650MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (85W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A770 +365%
19.66 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300
4.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Aug 2020
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

2100 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1280
256
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
32
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

307.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
614.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
39.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
19.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
85W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
Navi 14
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
Generation 12.7
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
7 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy