Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
4024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A770 +10357%
19.66 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Feb 2010
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2100 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
9
4096
Shading Units
72
256
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
8
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

307.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
614.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
39.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
43W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GT215
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy