Intel Arc A770M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A770M 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (2010MHz vs 1650MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A770M
+9%
13.52 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
12.35 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2023
Alchemist
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
4096
Shading Units
3072
256
TMUs
96
128
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
32
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
211.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
422.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
27.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
AD107
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
