Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc B580 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

Intel Arc B580 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM Arc B580 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc B580 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 187% (2670MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (456.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc B580 +1335%
13.67 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2024
Release Date
Dec 2013
Battlemage(Arc 5)
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2670 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2670 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
2375 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
456.0GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
512
160
TMUs
32
80
ROPs
16
160
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
256 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
18 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

213.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
427.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
27.34 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
1.709 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

BMG-G21
GPU Name
Cape Verde
SRPMF
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
Xe2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
19.6 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
272 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy