Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile vs Intel GMA 3150

Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile vs Intel GMA 3150

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM GMA 3150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
880 additional rendering cores
Intel GMA 3150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile +30223%
3.942 TFLOPS
GMA 3150
0.013 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
May 2007
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
GMA Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
-
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
2
24
ROPs
1
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
400.0 MPixel/s
123.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
800.0 MTexel/s
7.885 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.942 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.80 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Meteor Lake GT1
GPU Name
Pineview
-
GPU Variant
-
Xe-LPG
Architecture
Generation 4.0
Intel
Foundry
Intel
10 nm
Process Size
45 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.123 billion
Unknown
Die Size
66 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
13W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy