Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A30M vs NVIDIA GeForce 825M

Intel Arc Pro A30M vs NVIDIA GeForce 825M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 825M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 113% (2000MHz vs 941MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 825M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A30M +466%
4.096 TFLOPS
GeForce 825M
0.723 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jan 2014
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 800M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
850 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
941 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.528 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.11 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
722.7 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.11 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
33W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GK208
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy