Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A40 vs ATI FireGL V8600

Intel Arc Pro A40 vs ATI FireGL V8600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A40 +691%
3.482 TFLOPS
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
May 2007
Alchemist
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR4
96bit
Memory Bus
512bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
6.963 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
870.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
159W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
R600
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy