Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A40 vs AMD FirePro S9000

Intel Arc Pro A40 vs AMD FirePro S9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 and 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1700MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro S9000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A40 +7%
3.482 TFLOPS
FirePro S9000
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Aug 2012
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
6.963 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
870.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Tahiti
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy