Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A40 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Intel Arc Pro A40 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
808 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A40 +549%
3.482 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Sep 2008
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
448bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
27
1024
Shading Units
216
64
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
6.963 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
870.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GT200
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy