Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 147% (2350MHz vs 950MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A50 +41%
4.813 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Mar 2014
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
1024
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Tahiti
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Orthrus
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy