Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD FirePro W4000

Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD FirePro W4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock2350MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A50 +279%
4.813 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Aug 2012
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Pitcairn
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy