Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD FirePro W4100

Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD FirePro W4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock2350MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A50 +646%
4.813 TFLOPS
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Aug 2014
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
1024
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Cape Verde
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy