Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A50 vs NVIDIA T400

Intel Arc Pro A50 vs NVIDIA T400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 65% (2350MHz vs 1425MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A50 +339%
4.813 TFLOPS
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
May 2021
Alchemist
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
420 MHz
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
TU117
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy