Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A60M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

Intel Arc Pro A60M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (1300MHz vs 937MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A60M +344%
5.325 TFLOPS
GeForce MX350
1.199 TFLOPS
Blender
Arc Pro A60M +837%
1144
GeForce MX350
122
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2023
Release Date
Feb 2020
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
747 MHz
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
937 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
5
2048
Shading Units
640
128
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
256
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

83.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.99 GPixel/s
166.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.98 GTexel/s
10.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.74 GFLOPS
5.325 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1199 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
37.48 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-256
GPU Name
GP107
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy