Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (10W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T +1628%
11.06 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
0.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Mar 2023
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
LPDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
34.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
6144
Shading Units
512
192
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
16
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1280 GFLOPS
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
640.0 GFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
320.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

350W
TDP
10W
750 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA10B
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
190 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy