Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
6112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T +11071%
11.06 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Oct 2008
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
6144
Shading Units
32
192
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

350W
TDP
50W
750 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G96
-
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
UMC
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy