Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 32GB VRAM Quadro GV100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 868.4GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro GV100 's Advantages
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (250W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T
11.06 TFLOPS
Quadro GV100 +50%
16.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Mar 2018
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Volta
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1132 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
848 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
868.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
6144
Shading Units
5120
192
TMUs
320
96
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
208.3 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
520.6 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
33.32 TFLOPS
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.66 TFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.330 TFLOPS

Board Design

350W
TDP
250W
750 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GV100
-
GPU Variant
GV100-875-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Volta
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.0
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy