Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1815MHz
Lower TDP (230W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T
11.06 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000
11.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Aug 2018
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1815 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
6144
Shading Units
3072
192
TMUs
192
96
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.2 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.5 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.30 TFLOPS
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.15 TFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
348.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

350W
TDP
230W
750 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-875-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy