Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 436.2GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
Boost Clock1500MHz
Lower TDP (300W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T
11.06 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI25 +11%
12.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jun 2017
Xe Graphics
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
852 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2
4096bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
436.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
6144
Shading Units
4096
192
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

350W
TDP
300W
750 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
Generation 12.5
Architecture
GCN 5.0
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
10 nm
Process Size
14 nm
8 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy