Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Lower TDP (350W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
7936 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T
11.06 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X +332%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Nov 2021
Xe Graphics
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
128GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
-
-
-
6144
Shading Units
14080
192
TMUs
880
96
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

350W
TDP
500W
750 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Generation 12.5
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy