Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
7040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Boost Clock1306MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +726%
13.82 TFLOPS
GRID M3 3020
1.672 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
May 2016
Xe Graphics
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1033 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
7680
Shading Units
640
240
TMUs
40
120
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.90 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.24 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.672 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
Unknown
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.5
Shader Model
6.7 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy