Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 2GB VRAM GRID M60 2Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock1178MHz
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +186%
13.82 TFLOPS
GRID M60 2Q
4.825 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Aug 2015
Xe Graphics
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
7680
Shading Units
2048
240
TMUs
128
120
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GM204
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy