Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 8GB VRAM Quadro P4200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1647MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +82%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro P4200 Mobile
7.589 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Feb 2018
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1227 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1647 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
18
7680
Shading Units
2304
240
TMUs
144
120
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.4 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.2 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
118.6 GFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.589 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
100W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Pascal
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
16 nm
8 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy