CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 8
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 8
VS
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 8
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 8GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 8 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 8 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
Lower TDP (260W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
+7%
13.82 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 8
12.86 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
VS
GRID RTX T10 8
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Xe Graphics
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
4608
240
TMUs
288
120
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
260W
900 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
2
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
3
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000
4
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
5
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 S4
6
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID M60 8Q
7
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
8
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000
9
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K420
10
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy