CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q
VS
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1260MHz
Lower TDP (80W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
13.82 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 Max Q
+35%
18.71 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
VS
RTX A5500 Max Q
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Mar 2022
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
585 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1260 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
58
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
7424
240
TMUs
232
120
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.0 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
292.3 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.71 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.71 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
292.3 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA103
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
22 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
80W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
2
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
3
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
4
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
5
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M
6
NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
7
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
8
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
9
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100
10
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID K120Q
Related News
1
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
2
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
3
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
4
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
5
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
6
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
7
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
8
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
9
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
10
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy