Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA L4

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA L4

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 24GB VRAM L4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 300.1GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA L4 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (72W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
13.82 TFLOPS
L4 +119%
30.29 TFLOPS
VS
L4

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Mar 2023
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla Ada(Lxx)
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
795 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
24GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
192bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
300.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
60
7680
Shading Units
7424
240
TMUs
240
120
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
60
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
163.2 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
30.29 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
30.29 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
473.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
72W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
AD104
-
GPU Variant
AD104-???-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
5 nm
8 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy