CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
VS
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
7616 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
+8537%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
VS
Quadro FX 3600M
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Feb 2008
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
7680
Shading Units
64
240
TMUs
32
120
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
70W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000
2
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
3
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
4
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200
5
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
6
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
7
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600
8
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
9
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
10
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Related News
1
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
2
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
3
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
4
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
5
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
6
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
7
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
8
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
9
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
10
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy