CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
VS
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
7552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
+3826%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700M
0.352 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
VS
Quadro FX 3700M
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Aug 2008
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
7680
Shading Units
128
240
TMUs
64
120
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.800 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.20 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM3
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla M60
2
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M
3
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID K540Q
4
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB
5
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210
6
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000
7
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
8
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
9
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla P40
10
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200
Related News
1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy