Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
7552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +3645%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
0.369 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Mar 2007
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1536MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
7680
Shading Units
128
240
TMUs
32
120
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
368.6 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
171W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G80
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
90 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy