CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
VS
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
6336 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
+755%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000M
1.615 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
VS
Quadro K5000M
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Aug 2012
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
1344
240
TMUs
112
120
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.83 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.31 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.615 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.31 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q5-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
100W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
2
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
3
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
4
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
5
NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
6
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M
7
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
8
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000 SDI
9
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID A100B
10
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Related News
1
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
2
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
3
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
4
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
5
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
6
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
7
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
8
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
9
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
10
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy