Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro 600

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro 600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
7584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +5517%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro 600
0.246 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Dec 2010
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
96
240
TMUs
16
120
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.560 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.24 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
245.8 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.48 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GF108
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
40W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy