CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
VS
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1358MHz
Lower TDP (95W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
+98%
13.82 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile
6.953 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
VS
RTX A2000 Mobile
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Apr 2021
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
893 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1358 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
20
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
2560
240
TMUs
80
120
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.18 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.6 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.953 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.953 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
108.6 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA106
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
12 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
95W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
2
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
3
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
4
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
5
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
6
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
7
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
8
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
9
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2
10
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
Related News
1
Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits
2
Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU
3
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
4
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
5
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
6
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
7
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
8
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
9
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
10
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy