Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20m to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 208.0GB/s)
5184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla K20m 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +292%
13.82 TFLOPS
Tesla K20m
3.524 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jan 2013
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
5GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
320bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
2496
240
TMUs
208
120
ROPs
40
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GK110
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy