Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 SXM2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 732.2GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1480MHz
Lower TDP (300W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +30%
13.82 TFLOPS
Tesla P100 SXM2
10.61 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Apr 2016
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1328 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
7680
Shading Units
3584
240
TMUs
224
120
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
142.1 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
331.5 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.22 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.61 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.304 TFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
300W
900 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GP100
-
GPU Variant
GP100-890-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Pascal
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
16 nm
8 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.0
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy