Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 416.0GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock1380MHz
Lower TDP (80W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +95%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q
7.066 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
May 2019
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
780 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
40
7680
Shading Units
2560
240
TMUs
160
120
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
220.8 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.13 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.066 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
220.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
80W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
TU104
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy