Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 1133GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
13.82 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +13%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Nov 2019
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1312 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
5120
240
TMUs
320
120
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GV100
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Volta
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
250W
900 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.0
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy