Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA A10 PCIe

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA A10 PCIe

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 24GB VRAM A10 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 600.2GB/s)
NVIDIA A10 PCIe 's Advantages
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
A10 PCIe +111%
31.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2021
Data Center GPU
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
885 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
24GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
9216
256
TMUs
288
128
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
162.7 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
488.2 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.24 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.24 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
976.3 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA102
-
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy