CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA A10 PCIe
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA A10 PCIe
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA A10 PCIe
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 24GB VRAM A10 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 600.2GB/s)
NVIDIA A10 PCIe 's Advantages
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
A10 PCIe
+111%
31.24 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
A10 PCIe
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2021
Data Center GPU
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
885 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
24GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
9216
256
TMUs
288
128
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
162.7 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
488.2 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.24 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.24 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
976.3 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA102
-
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
3
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
4
NVIDIA Quadro 5000 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
5
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 1000 Model II
7
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla P10
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000
Related News
1
Complete Layout of Intel's Next-Gen LGA1851 Interface Exposed: A Comprehensive Look at PCIe and USB Features
2
Apple's 2025 OS in Development: iOS 19 Codename 'Luck'
3
Apple's AI is Memory Hungry! The Entire iPhone 16 Lineup Comes with 8GB RAM
4
Noctua Announce NH-D15 G2 Air Cooler and NF-A14x25r G2 Fan
5
The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation
6
Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits
7
Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU
8
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
9
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
10
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy