CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 2GB VRAM GRID M60 2Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock1178MHz
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+205%
14.75 TFLOPS
GRID M60 2Q
4.825 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
GRID M60 2Q
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Aug 2015
Data Center GPU
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
2048
256
TMUs
128
128
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GM204
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max Q
3
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla K40t
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
7
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x1
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
Related News
1
Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB
2
AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT
3
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
4
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
5
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
6
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
7
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
8
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
9
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
10
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy