Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
7952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +3314%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
5
8192
Shading Units
240
256
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy