CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
7952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+3314%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro 3000M
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
5
8192
Shading Units
240
256
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI8
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
3
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla S1070
7
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla K8
Related News
1
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
2
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
3
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
4
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
5
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
6
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
7
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
8
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
9
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
10
Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy