Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
8000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +4424%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro K1000M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q1-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
45W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy