Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 2800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
8096 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +5021%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2800M
0.288 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Dec 2009
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
8192
Shading Units
96
256
TMUs
48
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.80 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
288.0 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy