CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 2800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
8096 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+5021%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2800M
0.288 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro FX 2800M
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Dec 2009
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
8192
Shading Units
96
256
TMUs
48
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.80 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
288.0 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI8
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200
3
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID K100
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs AMD Instinct MI300X
7
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 1Q
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
Related News
1
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
2
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
3
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
4
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
5
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
6
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
7
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
8
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
9
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
10
Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy