CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
8160 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+18337%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro FX 1600M
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
8192
Shading Units
32
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
50W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla K40s
3
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs AMD Instinct MI300X
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070 Q
7
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q
Related News
1
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
2
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
3
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
4
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
5
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
6
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
7
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
8
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
9
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
10
Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy