Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
8160 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +18337%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
8192
Shading Units
32
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
50W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy