CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
7952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (189W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+2271%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5800
0.622 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro FX 5800
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
8192
Shading Units
240
256
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
189W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS
3
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20s
7
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla K40st
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla C870
Related News
1
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
2
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
3
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
4
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
5
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
6
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
7
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
8
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
9
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
10
Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy