Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
7952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (189W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +2271%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5800
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
8192
Shading Units
240
256
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
189W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy