CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
7552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+949%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro M2000M
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Dec 2015
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
640
256
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
55W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K600
3
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID K200
7
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 1Q
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m
Related News
1
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
2
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
3
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
4
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
5
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
6
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
7
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
8
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
9
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
10
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy