Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
7552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +949%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Dec 2015
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
640
256
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
55W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy